The Juror Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

The Juror - Term Paper ExampleThe jury should decide the facts in the grammatical case and then apply the facts to the law. For all the Americans, trial by a jury is a basic underlying right. The paper unders spunks the importance of getting a fair juror, who atomic number 18 capable of listening to the evidence presented and decision making the case based on facts rather than emotion. One may be summoned for one of the three core kinds of jury service, namely a Grand juror, a State Grand Juror, or a Petit Juror. Juries be mainly comprised of peck from all walks of life (intended to mirror the community) and does not require educational or skill requirements. Jurors atomic number 18 expected to remain impartial throughout the trial, weigh the evidence presented to them, and apply the law in an attempt to reach a verdict. Some great deal dislike the civic duty of being a juror and find all manner of excuses to disqualify themselves from this duty. In most case, requests to be excused are rarely granted, especially those based on religious beliefs, status, moral beliefs, and professional status (Sunstein, 2002). Most people cite inconvenience to a prospective trial juror nevertheless, this not a legal lawsuit to be excused from jury service though this may warrant postponement. Potential jurors are basically picked from various sources such as voter registration list, identification cardholders, and lists of licensed drivers. Hence, some people do not understand the difference between evidence highlighted in the media and evidence presented during the trial. This presents difficulties especially when such people are selected to be jurors during a trial (Waldrep, 2010). In the first episode, the prosecutor (Gerald Lewis) presents his version of event where he depicts Singh as a psychopath. The victims family threatens the accused on his arrival in court, and later opts to catch the jurors. In the course of the second episode (The Jury (ITV1)), Marcia r eceives a phone call directing her that, for the interestingness of her family, it would be advisable for her to vote guilty. In episode 3, Marcia continues to receive threats and informs the judge on the unfortunate developments nevertheless, she agrees to cohere on the judge indicates that if any other juror is adversely influenced, he will call for a retrial. These scenes demonstrate the challenges associated with being a juror. Discussion Surveys conducted by American Bar Association have show that, three out of four Americans are confident in the jury system as the fairest charge of determining whether the defendant is guilty or innocent in criminal cases. Jurors should weigh lawyers arguments, evidence, as strong a witness testimonies presented to reach a decision nevertheless, this does not prevent the possibility of being wedge by their life experiences, which may create a bias towards either side. The trial judge presides everywhere the trial and outlines what laws ap ply. The judge instructs the jury as the proper law in every case. Although, there are claims that a jury can nullify the law, such a perception come out as legally inaccurate and severely prejudices the application of justice. Jurors who may disregard the trial judges instruction manual have contravened their oath. Once the jury has arrived at its verdict, the presiding juror fills in and signs the verdict form. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of capital of South Carolina held that the jury possesses an unreviewable and irreversible power