Managers confuse BSC means with the ends Essay

Intel can maximize the success of the equilibrised wit implement by designing and implementing if properly. Cooperation of completely managers is significant to the success of balance card. Leadership within the scheme should make out that balanced scorecard is not a project measure kind of that it is a program of change. The leaders and managers leave behind be expended to mobilize the raft within the organization while launching the balance scorecard. Resistance is requisite and the managers of Intel should ensure that the managers see the benefits they could reap out of the management system.For instance, managers in confide of more than one program/project allowing benefit from limpidity when gauging mental work on. This is because he will be able to marry the desired results with the organization strategies as a performance measure as opposed to the unoriginal on time and on budget measure previously used. The balance scorecard will help managers to defend thei r project performance ground on facts rather than on speculation. More to that, organization dodge will be every persons job specifications thus more direction to employees motion will be raised.In the end, Intel will maximize its performance outcome significantly one thing to note is that the balance scorecard will be unique to the needs of Intel, meaning, the metrics used to measure the performance of Intel will also be decided by management. Recommendations The balanced scorecard implementation at Intel should occur first on a wile or experimentation basis before been replicated to the whole organization. This is because the process itself requires adequate to(predicate) funding and the results of the implementation process may vary and sometimes separate to make valuable impact.Think of it as a piloting program. The post is similar in other changes or projects undertaken within an organization, piloting is crucial companies, which have implemented balance scorecards voice certain challenges that Intel should be cognisant of for instance. Managers confuse BSC means with the ends. Other words, they confuse the investment of customers employees or suppliers with the close while this is just a mean to improving performance of the organization. In instances where the concept of balance sco0recard has been misunderstood, it has been used to justify poor performance in financial terms.In other cases, managers confuse an excellent design scorecard and clear metrics with the absolute winning strategy. Often this has taken precession over other equally important activities. Therefore, Intel should be to weary of ingeminate mistakes done by other companies and carefully deliberate and rethink the strategy of implementing the balance scorecard. The balanced scorecard is a suitable system that will benefit Intel greatly. A proper implementation plan should be create alongside the designing of the balance scorecard.Additionally, support from staff and top tr ain managers needs to be sought in order for the implementation process to be successful.REFERENCES Oorschot, A. H (2002). Developing a balanced carte du jour with arrangement Dynamics. Available AtHttp//Www. Minase. Nl/Pdf/balancced Pdf.. accessed on September 26, 2007. Bain & Company. (2002). Vencedoras Confirmadas. Hsm counselling, Sao Paulo, Ano 6, N. 31, P. 138-142, MarcoAbril. Balance scorecard institute. What is a balanced scorecard? Available at www. balancedscorecard. org accessed on September 26, 2007.Dickinson, J. R. (2003) The feasibility Of The balanced Scorecard For rail line Games. Developments in affair Simulation and experiential Learning. Baltimore, Vol. 30, 2003, 90-98. Espstein, M. J & Wisner, P. S. (2001) Increasing Corporate Accountability The External Disclosure Of equilibrate Scorecard Measures. Balanced Scorecard Report. Harvard Business School Press, Vol. 3, 4, 10-3. Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (2000) Having Trouble With Your dodge? Then Map It. Harvard Business Review. Boston, Vol. 78, 5, Sept-Oct 2000b, 76-167. Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D. P. (1993)Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work. Harvard Business Review. Boston, Vol. 71, 5, 134-147 Kaplan, R. S. Norton, D. P. (1996) Using The Balanced Scorecard As A Strategic attention System. Harvard Business Review. Boston, Vol. 74, 1, 75-851996. Norton, D. P. (2001) Building Strategy Maps Testing the Hypothesis. Balanced Scorecard Report. Harvard BusinessSchool Press, Vol. 3, 1, 1-4. Pray, T. F et al. (2003). Using the Balanced Scorecard To Improve Strategic Planning And efficient Decision Making Within Simulations.Developments In Business Simulation and experiential Learning, Baltimore, 30. Sauaia, A. (2001) Evaluation Of mathematical process In Business Games Financial and Non Financial Approaches. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, San Diego, vol. 27, 210-4. Kallas, D. & Sauaia, A. (2003) Cooperate For Profits Or cope For Market? Study of Oli gopolistic Pricing with a Business Game. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, Baltimore, V. 30, P. 232-242. Stewart, S. (2000) ABC, The Balanced Scorecard And EVA.Distinguishing The Means From The End. Evaluation, London, V. 1, 2. Young, S. D. & OByrne, S. F. (2001) EVA and Value-Based Management A Practical Guide To Implementation. New York McGraw-Hill, 2001. 248. Hoque, Z. & James, W. (2000). Linking Balanced Scorecard Measures to surface and Market Factors Impact on Organizational Performance. Journal of Management bill Research, 12, p. 1-17. Lipe, M. G. & Salterio, S. (2000). The Balanced Scorecard Judgmental Effects of Common and Unique Performance Measures. The Accounting Review, 75, 3, p.283-298. Dilla, W. & Steinbart, P. (2005).Relative Weighting of Common and Unique Balanced Scorecard Measures by Knowledge Decision Makers. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 17, p. 43-53. Warner, M. (2001). relative management critical perspectives on business management. London, Routledge publishers. Sunden, J. & Stralton (2006) Introduction To Mangment Accounting. London, Prentice hall. Kirkegaad, H. (1997). up Accounting Reliability Solvency, Insolvbency And Future Cash Flows. Westport, ct. quorum books publishers.